Search for: "Sanchez v. Smith et al" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Louis, Missouri, et al. issued a precedential ruling that will likely pave the way for more employee discrimination claims under Title VII. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
 The Court made no comment as it denied the appeal in Sanchez, et al., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Conference of November 20, 2007 __________________ Docket: 06-939 Case name: Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
City of Akron, et al    Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0260n.06 B & V Distr Co Inc v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:52 pm
" [5] Harm, causation and intent are notably absent from this analysis, but have been read into the tort by various courts interpreting the law. [6] The tort has been further narrowed, perhaps out of fear that the average person could find themselves at risk for prosecution while engaging in routine gossip or that speech that should be protected constitutionally will become suspect. [7] An example of this concern can be found in the case of Florida Star v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]